The Warhead Cable Test Dilemma

Question 1According to Kohlbergs incorrupt development theory, Stanton Wong moral development should be at post-conventional level, where it is believed that caring for some other is everyones obligation. It is because he is occupying with the vigorous organism of the innocent civilians and the military personnel if a faulty projectile misfired. Beside that, he in like manner thinking a method of solving the business so that everyone is c atomic number 18d for equally and nobody will harmed by the faulty cable.For beset Jackson, he stage of moral development is at the pre-conventional level. At this level, expedience is emphasized and values ar adhered to in order to avoid penalty and also be rewarded. It git be proved by his by design to ignore the result of the product test and do not land action to correct the line. It is because he does not think of the well being of the civilians and military personnel because he more worries about getting punishment from higher up if the warhead cable poopt be gestate on time to the customer. From here we can see that he tenseness on his self-interest more than the values of other people.Question 2I think Stanton Wong should depict the test result to the customers source inspector, Jane Conway foremost and ask Jane to perform redundant sample testing. I think it can help to convince Harry Jackson to s happen the cable for transport out for the customer if Jane found out there is a problem occurred on the cable. If Harry still refuse to solve the problem, then Stanton should report the case to the top management who have the power to change Harrys decision. iodine of the ethical reasoning is logic, it way before we can conclude or make a judgement , we have to ensure that premise, either literal or inferred, are know and clear.In this case, I think it is consistent for Stanton to report the problem to authorities if the faulty items could harm innocence and also because he cares about the civilians and armed forces. Accuracy is one of the ethical reasoning, it means whatever evidence cited to support our judgement should be accurate, relevant, and complete. So, before he reports to top management, he should ask the source inspector to run additional test to ensure the previous test result is accurate and certainly. The other criteria of ethical reasoning is consistency. It states whatever decision a person make or action taken should consistent with his or her moral values. Thus, Stanton should makes a decision that does not contrary with his moral values.Question 3Currently, I think he should not be a whistle blower. Because there are several methods to solve this problem internally,such(prenominal) as informing the problem to top management and thus he should not involve public media in solving this problem. Beside that, he should considers his map as an employee. As a employee, his role is creating values for the company or help the company the achieve its goals. If he b lows the whistle on his own company, it will defame the company overconfident he might get fired or distrust by his colleagues. At the meantime, it might consider unethical to be a whistle-blower because it doesnt bring any positive values for company and may against the conducts as an employee. In addition, the effect may cause to the company if the scandal concern a company leak out is always out of estimation, so he should not risk his career and the fame of his company since there are other methods can be use to solve this problem.Question 4The company already have the protocol in testing and reporting of product tests. The company could heavily punish those who do not abide by the protocol to avoid this kind of situation. In additional, the company should be particular(prenominal) when hiring the plant manager. They should hire someone with commodity moral values such as honesty and sincerity. Beside that, they should make sure the plant manager is open-minded, and with go od interpersonal or people management skills. It can help to veto this kind of situation because a open-minded manager able to see to advices or opinions and making wise decision based on evidences.Beside that, a manager with good interpersonal or people management skills could resurrect the performance of the employees and this increase the quality of the product. Furthermore, I think the company can give the quality control supervisor the power to stop or adjust the production if product failure occurred. It is often costly to spue the product when it was finished. Thus, the company should allow the quality control supervisor to dumbfound out and solve the problem instantly without waiting further management from plant manager.