The change in marriage and divorce figures over a 20 year period

In this evidence I provide look at the potpourri in unification and divide figures over a 20 year period. I will look mainly at the atomic number 18a of divorce and how this may absorb affected the relationships at bottom marri date, within my chosen time scale, to explore how a changing corporation may adjudge resulted in the breakdown (or election to not undertake) union. I have looked at information from 1978 and then at 1998 from the official statistics for these two areas. I will look at data from two sepa aim geezerhood, further twenty long time apart to institute what changes if any can be describen in such a elfin time scale.The data I will use is taken from the powerfulness of Population Censuses Surveys. Marriage and divorce Statistics (1980 &1998). I have converted them to percentages, to make water them easer to understand and rounded them to the nearest 0. 01%. I have not include the widowed figures in this essay As this is not a filling like divorce or marriage. Looking back over the divorce judge and how they have changed, showed that from as far back as 1901 to the posthumous 1960s with only a small increase from the 60s to the modern 1970s.Divorce rates were quite consistent from 1. 4% to 2%. Then surrounded by the late 1970s to today a huge leap. Between 1978 and 1980, there was a commodious amount of move ment in the rights of women in respect of work and benefits rights. As well as well-disposed changes in respect of how divorce and ratify mothers were viewed. Was there a shift from a patriarchy society? Women became up to(p) to function in society without a man or marriage. So what do the stats show? In 1978 Looking across all (adult) age groups, 50. 5% were marred, 40. % were single. With those divorced showing only 2. 1%, the figures for 1998 show that 43. 7% were single, with only 42. 8% marred.This shows one area of change, little people acquiring marred, although the figures do not indicate those living to gether unmarried (which raises the fountainhead of value placed on the position or marriage in todays society). When we look at the figures for divorce in 1978 then at 1998, the change is easy to see. In 1978 only 2. 1% of adults were divorced, only 20 years later it was 6. % an increase of 4. 7% to a greater extent. The years after the war up to 1978 showed only a small difference form the 1945 to 1978, only 0. 5%. Yet in this 20 year section there is a rapid increase, the figures likewise shows an increase of remarriages. If we take a authority those remarried, the divorce rate is 10%. The age people marry today has also changed, 26. 8 % in 1978 were marred by 25 years old. By 1998 this had dropped to only 10. 3%. And later in life, age 65 to 70 years of age. Over 51% marred in 1998 as apposed to 29. 3% in 1978.The figures show in 1978 marriage lasted longer with less ending in divorce, by 1998 marriage was later in life, with more chance of divorce, and this also raised the amo unt of 2nd marriages. NOTEDivorce rates did jump between 1972 and 1972 but this is could be argued was a result of the Divorce Reform feign of 1969 The way we record what is a family unit has been forced to change with less people marrying a family in the 70s was a social unit consisting of a wife, husband and dependent children (Huges & Fergusson 2000, P49)Whereas today a family is defined as a marred or cohabiting couple, with or with out their never married children (who have no children of their own), or a loan parent with such children. great deal living alone are not considered to form a family (social trends, 1999, P43) In 1997 there were only 310,000 marriages altogether, this was the lowest recorded figures of the 20th century, and more divorces were brought by women on the grounds of unreasonable behavior some 70% (ONS, 2000, p. 9)This is could be argued label a change with women now making sociality move away from a patriarchal ideology, some commentators in the 70s ta lked of marriage moving towards one of accord Michael Young and peter Willmott argued that women no longer needed the male staff of life winner, and with more legal support and better rights in/access to employment, the relationships within marriage hade to change, Young and Willmott said this symmetry could be seen in segment of labor in the home, with the old distinction between mens and womens jobs suitable increasingly blurred, a shift to joint decision making, and increasing clip social life Young and Willmott 1973 p. 343) So not only the way the family unit is seen in society has changed, it could be argued, but the relationships within marriage undergone change.In this small gap of 20 years, women it could be argued have more control, no longer has the man got more power then the cleaning woman in the home relationship. Of course this is not true of the older generation, although with social change each generation brings its own values to the front. We can see today with marriage declining, more ending in divorce, modern society places less value on marriage than there parents did. Old clean-living values are been eroded away, for a faster consumer orientated society.Things are for today and out of fashion next week. It would seam that if current trends advance as they have from 1978 to 1998 will anybody both to get married in 30 years time. Will relationships become more of a effortless affair? Will women gain more control than men with in relationships. Women with the emergence of things such as the pill, sperm banks for single potential mothers women. The position of men within society us under more pressure and uncertainty the more we move into the new modern equal society.