Single Fathers Versus Single Mothers

Single Fathers The Single Fathers versus Single Mothers First delineate Last summons College / University you be enrolled at Professors Name Subject The Single Fathers versus Single Mothers The plight of star mothers has been all in addition familiar in the recent years. Social usefulnesss have been tailor-made made to cater to their necessarily. It is with them that our society sympathizes. Then again, we seem to have disregarded that while there is a star mother, there is the mavin give who suffers just the same. He is that other p device of the completely.He also has his own rights, needs and story that deserves to get noniced and paid attention to. Indeed, he too matters and that is for sure. The number of single commences in the United States registered to ab stunned 2. 5 gazillion by the year 2007. Of the 2. 5 million, 40 % of them ar divorced, 4% atomic number 18 widowed and the remaining 16 % argon isolated. Eight percent of the commonwealth rears three or more small fryren below 18 years of age. approximately 14 % of this population has been non been living in their own home bases.The yearbook income of 27 % of these families amounts to ab place $ 50,000 or more (Information Please Database, 2007). This has been a commodious population boost as way back in 1970, single mothers account to about 90 % of the single family population while single dumbfounds only numbers to 400,000 (Gillenkirk, 2000). The Ameri terminate family is a lot different today. more than and more fathers left to rear their children after a break up are starting to out number the single mother population, almost twice as a great deal. More than 2 million, which is about one twenty percent of the population of single parents today, are single fathers.Even though the medias portrayal of single parents still focuses primarily on single moms, working single fathers direct register to about 30 % of the single parents population (Gillenkirk, 2000). Fo r most affectionate workers, peculiarly the ones involved in the eud carryonia department and civil service find it hard to fit in quality time in their schedules. Most of their time is consumed by long working hours. They could not apply of night shifts to prevail time off from work. As a result, they rarely spend worthwhile moments with their kids (Jaff, 1983).In the tender work practice, fathers are branded as the hard to reach knobs. Most lower class single fathers are labeled this way. Their working habits or their seeming escape of interest whitethorn be to blame. These seem to augment the bad reputation of fathers as unconstructive and impassive and almost endlessly pass the burden of responsibility to their wives. As if to add insult to injury, home visits are scheduled during the daytime and most of them are designed primarily for the mother and children, the father, in most cases is overlooked. agreement schedules favorable to the father barely happen.If onl y loving work practices get out include single fathers in their clients list, they are most likely to serve (Jaff, 1983). Stereotyping among fathers themselves still abound the paternal purpose in the dry land of accessible services. In some cases, their roles are dictated by social workers. The lack of efforts to include single fathers in social work practices are taken as a non involvement. While there is no denying of the incidents wherein fathers are out of reach, it must be noted how ever that most of this cases happen in social work programs primarily catered to single mothers.Even though equal magnificence are considered and expected, single fathers are seldom if not neer the study clients as far as social work practices are concerned, by default or design (Jaff, 1983). The seeming exclusion of fathers in the social work practice was founded on either conceptual or organisational solid grounds. The irony is that most children in placement came from families with u nhealthy father child relationships. Sadly, making up for such loss never happens. While the importance of incorporating the fathers role in such programs is slowly gaining recognition, what is ideal does not always exists in reality, though.Still, there is a decline in terms of compact and fathers barely get the accommodation they deserve (Jaff, 1983). This kind of development is much awaited by the social work practice in general, particularly the children involved. They know too thoroughly that there is a large surmise of ignoring the father as an important client. Countless reasons contribute to this scenario. Nevertheless, fathers are not valued nor are they assisted at the really least in the field of research and social work practice. He is deemed to be the ambitious rather than partner in delivering social work practices.The fathers role is of equal importance with that of the mother. If only outreach programs are incorporated, working hours is not a matter and if onl y cultures are respected, fathers can turn to social work practices whenever he needs a helping hand (Jaff, 1983). In the world today, the fathers role and problems as a client in the social work practice, commands a second glance. This is peculiarly sure now that womens rights and roles are redefined. The father and the mother are now treated as two separate entities, thanks to the dictates of the modern world.Moreover, examen family roles is more acceptable today than ever before. Maternal as well as paternal roles are gaining it most deserved attention (Jaff, 1983). The have it off of the fathers rights as a partner in social work practices is one thing. It has never been so important to be reminded that efficient child welfare practices must be delivered. Both parents need to be involved as they form part of a whole. After all, the process starts with them. Biological or psychological, a parents participation is crucial.It can make or break the whole child welfare practice n o matter how noble the aim can possibly be (Jaff, 1983). A century ago, fathers left home in search for a job to sustain his family. Back thence the father is the breadwinner, a place that held a stable footing for a while. Undoubtedly, over the years, men have endured countless struggles to assuage true to this mistaken role in the family. Nevertheless, at the turn of yet another century, the masculine of the species being the sole providers remained to be the standard (Shaklee Year).However, such standard has been challenged by current changes in the family set up for the past couple of years. An change magnitude number of married women are fixning to enter the employment scene. This includes mothers of little children. With this thing happening now, are fathers as breadwinners nearing extinction? (Shaklee Year). As mothers begin to enter the work force, the fathers are compelled to pay a price. Husbands of employed mothers have the appearance _or_ semblance to suffer ment al anxiety and distress more as compared to husbands of stay at home moms. There are men who see themselves as a deficient provider.While womens liberation has done good things to the fe young-begetting(prenominal) of species, it has run-down the conventional concepts of machismo and fatherhood. In effect, it posted a challenge to the prototype of a man as a sole provider (Shaklee Year). The role of the father as a breadwinner may soon come to an end. Differing trends could be the reason for its downfall. Separating oneself from a certain role is a good recourse especially when conventional roles are at stake. Since the marrying age of men is getting high, they are most likely to father relatively few children.Moreover they would most likely file for divorce sooner or later. This trend includes children born out of wedlock, whose fathers participation is almost negligible. In addition, children out of wedlock who seldom take up support from them fathers are part of this trend. The amount of quality time divided up by fathers and his family has gone down by 43 % from 1960 until 1980. These fathers have separated themselves from family life primarily because of the recent redefinition of the fathers role in the family (Shaklee Year). The reverse of the process may be echoed by the second trend.This can be characterized by mens view of their involvement in the family life as a measure of happiness. The average American father would trade job promotion for quality time (Shaklee Year). It took us how more years to be able to weigh against this reaffirmation the role of the male species in the family today to his role back when the days were young. The year was 1800s when the strong male image came to life. The fathers role in child development and family life is vital as far as the home, being the focus of the work is concerned.However, when work leaves home, fathers become insignificant in the aspect of child development. As mothers grace the employment scen e, the fathers role in the childrens lives are stressed like never before. Initially, fathers may not be comfortable to assume this role since they are not used with this kind of set up. Though they may not see their fathers like themselves, they can very much resemble the role their great grandfathers used to play at home (Shaklee Year). Today, a ripening number of men are beginning to value a world beyond work and success.Things then known to be the measures of lifes worth. Now, they know that there is certainly nothing more of value than witnessing the early few gaits of their child, that sweet kiss on the cheek, the seemingly complicated art of tying a shoelace, that clip perfectly placed on her signal or his boys first attempt to shoot that ball. These are the things can never be replaced by any amount of pay for a job well done. Though it can never be well articulated in words, that sense of satisfaction can for sure get any single father through the pains of his fate.T he quantify when a father is able to watch a child amaze and actually be there for him from the minute he begins to defy soberness until such time when he can very well take care of himself are the very moments when the much needed strength may be drawn from. These are the things that can make loss and custody battles a little bit more bearable than it actually is (Gillenkirk, 2000). The very same things that remind him that after all, allthing will be worth every pain endured and tear shed along the way. References Gillenkirk, J. Fathermag. com. (2000, November 4).A Revolution in American Fathering. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http//www. fathermag. com/107/fathers/ Information Please Database. (2007). Fathers by the Numbers. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http//www. infoplease. com/spot/dadcensus1. html. Jaff, E. D. (1983). Fathers and Child Welfare service The Forgotten Clients. Laurence Erlbaum Ass, 129 37. Shaklee, H. ccc. (Year). Fathers in America 100 Years of C hange. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http//www. agls. uidaho. edu/ccc/CCC%20Families/Research/fathers. htm